Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
Published: 2023-03-18

Evaluation of oncology-related healthcare professionals' knowledge and practices on sustainable nutrition, Ankara, Turkey

Department of Public Health, Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey


Background: Increasing population, limited resources, and climate change require adopting more sustainable diets. This study aims to evaluate health professionals' knowledge levels and practices on sustainable nutrition.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between January 2022 and May 2022 at Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital in Ankara. The research was performed by using the "Stretched Sampling Method". A semi-structured and self-reported online survey was recruited to collect data from healthcare professionals. Data from 298 participants were subjected to descriptive and univariate analyses to evaluate differences in knowledge mean scores and SCOFI scores. The data analysis results with the SPSS 26.0 program were accepted as a 95% confidence interval, with significance p≤0.05.

Result: A total of 298 people participated in the study. The mean age of respondents was 36 years (13±10.8). More than two-thirds (79.2%) were females, more than half (52%) were nurses, 20.5% were doctors, 60.4% had a bachelor's degree, % and 12.8 had a master's degree. Sustainable nutrition knowledge and SCOFI mean scores were 10.71±5.3 (0-24) and 54.09±13.2, respectively. 37.9% of the participants stated that they had heard of the concept of sustainable nutrition before. The sustainable nutrition knowledge of females was lower, and the SCOFI score was higher (P>0.05). The SCOFI score of the 18-25 age group was lower than the other age groups (P<0.05). Sustainable nutrition knowledge means scores increased as the education level increased (P<0.05). Dieticians had the highest sustainable nutrition knowledge and SCOFI score (P<0.05). The SCOFI score of those working in the surgery room and intensive care unit was lower than the other units (P<0.05).

Conclusion: Training for healthcare professionals might increase sustainable nutrition knowledge and awareness.


Download data is not yet available.


  1. WCED U. Brundtland Report-Our Common Future; 1987. Available from: [Accessed on 5 November 2022]
  2. Şen H, Kaya A, Alpaslan B. A historical and current perspective on sustainability (Sürdürülebilirlik üzerine tarihsel ve güncel bir perspektif). Ekonomik Yaklaşım Derneği. 2018;29:1-47. doi: 10.5455/ey.39101
  3. FAO. Sustaınable Dıets and Bıodıversıty; 2010. Roma. Available from: [Accessed on 13 November 2022]
  4. FAO/WHO. Sustainable healthy diets – Guiding principles; 2019. Roma. Available from: [Accessed on 16 November 2022]
  5. Global Panel on Agriculture and Food Systems for Nutrition. The Cost of Malnutrition; 2016. London, UK. Available from:,or%20US%24500%20per%20individual. [Accessed on 16 November 2022]
  6. Perignon M, Vieux F, Soler LG, Masset G, Darmon N. Improving diet sustainability through evolution of food choices: review of epidemiological studies on the environmental impact of diets. Nutrition Reviews. 2017;75(1):2-17. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuw043
  7. Tubiello FN, Rosenzweig C, Conchedda G, Karl K, Gütschow J, Xueyao P, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions from food systems: building the evidence base. Environmental Research Letters. 2021;16(6):065007. doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac018e
  8. FAO. The State of the World's Land and Water Resources for Food and Agrıculture; 2011. Available from: [Accessed on 5 November 2022]
  9. FAO. Water for Sustainable Food and Agriculture; 2017. Roma. Available from: [Accessed on 5 November 2022]
  10. Willett W, Rockström J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, Vermeulen S, et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 2019;393(10170):447-92. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31788-4
  11. Sample Size Calculator by Raosoft, Inc.; 2021. Available from: [Accessed on 15 February 2023]
  12. Gülsöz S. The evaluation of the levels of knowledge and practice on sustainable nutrition of individuals' aged twenty years and over. M.Sc. Thesis, The University of Başkent.2017. Available from: [Accessed on 22 November 2022]
  13. Akay G. Evaluation of the knowledge levels of university students studying health about sustainable nutrition and environment relationship. M.Sc. Thesis, The University of Necmettin Erbakan.2020. Available from: [Accessed on 22 November 2022]
  14. Erasmus+ Program of the European Union. Sustainable Consumption of Food Index; 2020. Available from: [Accessed on 21 November 2022]
  15. Erasmus+ Program of the European Union. The SCOFI Tecnical Notes and Calculatıon; 2020. Available from: [Accessed on 21 November 2022]
  16. Engin Ş. The relationship between knowledge and behaviors on sustainable nutrition with food preferences of Bahçeşehir University undergraduate students. M.Sc. Thesis, The University of Bahçeşehir.2022. Available from: [Accessed on 22 November 2022]
  17. García-González Á, Achón M, Carretero Krug A, Varela-Moreiras G, Alonso-Aperte E. Food sustainability knowledge and attitudes in the Spanish adult population: A cross-sectional study. Nutrients. 2020;12(10). doi: 10.3390/nu12103154
  18. Erasmus+ Program of the European Union. Sustainable Consumption of Food Need Analysıs Report; 2019. Available from: [Accessed on 22 November 2022]
  19. Torabian-Riasati S, Lippman S, Nisnevich Y, Plunkett S. Food sustainability knowledge and ıts relationship with dietary habits of college students. Austin J Nutri Food Sci. 2017;5(2): 1089.
  20. Atar A. Evaluation of corporate company employees' knowledge, attitudes and behaviors about sustainable nutrition. M.Sc. Thesis, The University of İstanbul Medipol.2021. Available from: [Accessed on 22 November 2022]
  21. Alberdi G, Begiristain-Zubillaga M. The promotion of sustainable diets in the healthcare system and ımplications for health professionals: A scoping review. Nutrients. 2021;13(3):747. doi: 10.3390/nu13030747
  22. Wilson ED, Garcia AC. Environmentally friendly health care food services: a survey of beliefs, behaviours, and attitudes. Can J Diet Pract Res. 2011;72(3):117-22. doi: 10.3148/72.3.2011.117
  23. Wang L, Huang W, Zhao C, Hu Y, Cui S. Exploring the environment-nutrition-obesity effects associated with food consumption in different groups in China. J Environ Manage. 2022;317:115287. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115287
  24. Alemdağ M. Health promoting lifestyle behaviors of healthcare personnel working in the operating theatre and determination of the related factors. M.Sc. Thesis, The University of Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt.2019. Available from: [Accessed on 22 November 2022]
  25. Kalın Z. The effect of stress levels of operating room nurses on healthy lifestyle behaviors in the COVİD-19 pandemic. M.Sc. Thesis, The University of İstanbul.2022. Available from: [Accessed on 22 November 2022]
  26. Gençgün F. An assessment of healthy lifestyle behaviour in surgical and intensive care nurses. M.Sc. Thesis, The University of Okan.2018. Available from: [Accessed on 23 November 2022]
  27. El-Sherif A, El-Sherif S, Taylor AH, Ayakannu T. Ovarian Cancer: Lifestyle, Diet and Nutrition. Nutrition and Cancer. 2021;73(7):1092-107. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2020.1792948
  28. Vineis P, Huybrechts I, Millett C, Weiderpass E. Climate change and cancer: converging policies. Molecular Oncology. 2021;15(3):764-9. doi:
  29. Simões LMFR, Tavares NAR, Ferreira-Pêgo C. Plant-Based Diet and IGF-1 Modulation on HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Lifestyle Medicine Nutrition Approach in Oncology. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 2021;16(1):36-45. doi: 10.1177/15598276211023048

How to Cite

Çelikkaya EB Çelikkaya. Evaluation of oncology-related healthcare professionals’ knowledge and practices on sustainable nutrition, Ankara, Turkey. jidhealth [Internet]. 2023 Mar. 18 [cited 2023 Mar. 24];6(1):806-13. Available from: